This could even be pre-empted, for example, an unacknowledged retraction could be explained in a covering letter. The letters are completely fictional, with invented names and situations. I/We agree with this comment. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. [CDATA[// >How to write a response to the reviewers of your manuscript Im also attaching a certificate from Proof-Reading-Service.com verifying that the article has been professionally proofread with special attention to meeting the Journal of Changing Weather author guidelines for formatting, structure and referencing. These cookies do not store any personal information. I would suggest that you wait for a couple of weeks more, and if there's still no response from the journal, send another polite inquiry to the editor. Understand the importance of the peer review pro-cess. Is it impolite if I send an inquiry to the editor about review status? Letter to the editor: Cape Elizabeth, Falmouth should join homelessness As with just about anything though, there are some exceptions. 6 effective tips to help you communicate better with journals. I think you should just wait patiently for some time now. Ive looked over the Journal of Changing Weather author guidelines again and see exactly where Ive gone wrong and what changes need to be made. Even if your paper is rejected outright, dont just send the original version to another journal: it is possible that another journal will give a similar verdict (and possibly even use the same reviewers! As you work through your revisions, its best to work on your point-by-point response at the same time, like a journal of your revisions. I hope that the changes Ive made resolve all your concerns about the article. But it's now 5 days past the end of January, and the journal has not responded. Nothing more. //--> The problem is that I didn't find any correlation between the two variables and I well explained this in the letter to the reviewers. Choose "Submit New Manuscript." A signed copyright assignment and financial disclosure form must be submitted with the letter. One out of every fifteen or so was an email telling me why I was wrong (and usually not anywhere near that polite). Don't be that person: one way to make sure you remember is to always include line numbers in your changes. We have addressed each of them as follows., Third person: We thank Reviewer 1 for their detailed and useful comments. 2002 Step 1 - Desk Review by the Journal Editor In most cases, after your manuscript is submitted, it undergoes an initial review by one of the journal editors. We must note that subjective well-being is not a central theme in our study. Clear | concise | academic translator | journal editor | peer editor DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.01011 Journal of Clinical Oncology - published online before print June 27, 2023 PMID: 37369091 Reply to C. Springfeld et al We also revised Figure 3 and added two sentences to the Discussion to explain this model (p. 10, lines 13). Reviewers shouldnt have to re-read your whole manuscript again, combing it for your changes. 6 types of editorial queries and how to respond - American Nurse Journal Most journals take a few weeks for the initial editorial assessment, but in your case, its been too long. But unless the reviewers request was completely off-base or misinformed, try to incorporate it at least partially. Can I replace an image at the proofing stage before publication? Cactus Communications. Keep in mind that youve already done well to make it this far! Otherwise, you never would have sent your piece in the first place. All of which are well within your reach. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? Heres your guide to if, when, and how to respond. Copy and paste each comment into a new document (dont just refer to Comment 1, Reviewer 1 as this will take time for the journal staff to cross-reference). 2 The authors highlighted the problem of akathisia, a potential side effect of olanzapine. Responses from journals, and responding to them, Structure and style of a journal rebuttal letter, First-person or third-person structure are both OK, If you agree with the suggestion and revised accordingly, If you disagree with the peer reviewers suggestion, 1.1 Responses from journals, and responding to them, 2 Structure and style of a journal rebuttal letter, 2.1 Polite, generic header and salutation, 2.5.1 First-person or third-person structure are both OK, 2.5.2 If you agree with the suggestion and revised accordingly. Our point-by-point responses to the reviewers comments are shown below., Editors are busy people and may only skim through response letters. We have described this change in Statistical Analysis in the Methods section (p.4, lines 1520). 6). A journal response letter is another opportunity for you to emphasize the importance and impact of your work to the journal, demonstrate your knowledge and authority on the research, and fully address the issues the peer reviewers have identified., Geraldine Echue, PhD, CMPPEdanz Managing Editor. Privacy Policy
Each letter to an editor is unique, so the following letters are only examples, but they will provide you with ideas about how to format and word your own replies to academic and scientific editors. 1. Thats what the contract was for. The individual staff member might no longer be employed by the company. This is a normal reaction for a fledgling researcher. I see that the guidelines indicate that tables should be on a vertical/portrait page, but I also notice that a few articles in the printed version of the Journal of Changing Weather feature tables on a horizontal/landscape page, so perhaps that would be a good layout for increasing the clarity of Table 3. I generally just smiled and moved on to the next paper, after all. Responding to Manuscript Reviewer and Editor Comments Well, thats one way to guarantee youll never get published! Even broad-reaching open-access journals are quite selective: PLOS ONE takes about 45% of submissions and BMJ Open about 40%. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. [CDATA[// > How do I submit a letter to the editor? - JMIR Publications I would definitely recommend responding to this email. [CDATA[// > However, there are cases where responding to a status update is necessary, and they will usually be obvious. I think you should explain the urgency of your situation to the journal and request them to expedite the process. No, unfortunately, the editor did not state anything beyond that she accepts my piece for publication. Contact the journal editor immediately: - If there have been some changes to the list of authors on your submitted manuscript. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Responding to Manuscript Reviewer and Editor Comments - SAGE Journals By letting some time pass, you give yourself the opportunity to let your emotions subside, important for preventing an impulsive and heated response, which you would undoubtably regret later. Should I apologize/provide reasons when I resubmit after sitting on a referee report for 14 months? PDF RESPONSE TO DECISION LETTER - The BMJ Then Get Over It The rare scientific paper is the one accepted without any need for revision. Using a Venn diagram, state the similarities and differences of a research paper to a research report. Clearly mention the paper in question and provide a citation to the . Mention a date by which you would need a decision. If youre willing to wait, let them know. Then youre off to another journal and have to go through all the same steps. What is the minimum number of comments to be included while proofing my paper? Once a decision has been reached, you . If they wanted you to revise and submit again, they would have told you that. Start by thanking the reviewers for identifying the weaknesses in your paper and providing you the opportunity to strengthen your research prior to publication. 1 1 2 Reviewer No. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. Using a Venn diagram, state the similarities and differences of a research paper to a research report. Top 10 Tips for Responding to Reviewer and Editor Comments If theres a typo, thats one thing. Thank you for your letter regarding my manuscript entitled Effect of Changing Weather Patterns on Home Insurance Policies: Clients Left Out in the Cold? Im delighted that youre interested in the paper and think it might be appropriate for the Journal of Changing Weather. [CDATA[> The art of well-mannered rebuttal can be difficult to grasp but there is nothing inherently wrong about disagreeing on some of the reviewers points. What makes a good journal response letter? Is it okay to email a journal editor and ask if your paper is You should never respond to an acceptance by doing any of the following: Other than that, responding to an acceptance is pretty simple. Within the opening paragraph, a salutation to the LTE is optional but may erode into the limited word count. The editor is regretfully informing you that your work did not make the cut. One of my papers got accepted yesterday. Conditional acceptance then rejection worthy of appeal? , I received plenty of replies to rejection. When writing your responses, beclear, concise and use evidenceto show your changes or reasons why you have dealt with the comments in a particular way. [CDATA[> One of the biggest mistakes made by authors is to respond to all the comments, but forget to actually update the paper. Give this Article . You need to know what theyre looking for here. If you completely disagree with a reviewers suggestion, you need to give a convincing counterargument. Whether you are looking for information on designing an academic or scientific article, constructing a scholarly argument, targeting the right journal, following journal guidelines with precision, providing accurate and complete references, writing correct and elegant scholarly English, communicating with journal editors or revising your paper in light of that communication, you will find guidance, tips and examples in this manual. Page and line numbers were also used to indicate where the changes were made. This was a shorter comment. A form rejection means the editor has given you no personal feedback at all. Response: Thank you for this suggestion. If you can, respond within the same day. Cactus Communications. Cookie Notice
As stated above, the only response to a rejection should be brief and polite. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience. //--> Thank you for pointing this out. They just published you. Dr Sandra JonesDepartment of Social SciencesUniversity of the Pacific CoastP.O. The editor then has a few options: For example, reviewer 1 might state Table 2 is superfluous please remove, whereas reviewer 2 might state Table 2 requires additional explanation on the dataset reported in column 3. How to communicate with the journal editor. Responding to the comments peer reviewers offer when they assess your research paper can be as challenging as writing the original manuscript, especially when the necessity of revising your paper to resolve problems is considered as well. Take that acceptance with pride. ( ) ( ) can be used to estimate the uncertainty in AE where and are the uncertainties in AOD at two different wavelengths (Hamonou et al., 1999). Youve presumably already thanked them for their time in your cover letter. But they want to get the impression that the authors are being comprehensive and taking the process seriously. 2002 How do you respond to emails from editors? Pretty easy, right? Asked by Ahmad Sabihi Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. Dont be the annoying writer who keeps sending story after story after story. That makes it even more commendable. You also may not agree with all the peer reviewers requests and suggestions. PDF Response to Editor - Copernicus.org Peer reviewers arent perfect, but they are standing between you and publication. [CDATA[// >